Business secretary Peter Kyle dismisses Trump’s claim illegal migration ‘destroys countries from within’
Good morning. Donald Trump has gone, but his voice and his impact haven’t. Although Keir Starmer got through their joint press conference without mishap, the president’s comments at Chequers about illegal migration are being reported this morning very prominently – in part because they resonate with the big chunk of political opinion in the UK inclined to agree.
Telegraph splash Photograph: Daily TelegraphSun splash Photograph: SunMail splash Photograph: Daily MailExpress splash Photograph: Daily ExpressTimes splash Photograph: The TimesGuardian splash Photograph: The Guardian
For Trump, who he seems to judge success almost entirely by how much media attention he can command, this is a triumph.
Peter Kyle, the business secretary, was on the media round for the government this morning and inevitably he was asked about this. No 10 has a minor sliver of good news on small boats this morning – a second person has been returned to France under the “one in, one out” deal.
But interviewers wanted to know what Kyle thought about Trump’s comments. At Chequers the president claimed illegal migration “destroys countries”. Trump said:
I think your situation is very similar. You have people coming in and I told the prime minister I would stop it, and it doesn’t matter if you call out the military, it doesn’t matter what means you use
It destroys countries from within and we’re actually now removing a lot of the people that came into our country.
Asked on ITV’s Good Morning Britain if he agreed with Trump about this, Kyle replied:
No. What I do believe is that illegal migration is something that is impacting our politics here in the UK. It is something that the British public expect this government to get a grip on.
That is why today, when we have the second flight taking off with a migrant who doesn’t have the right to stay here being returned as part of the new returns agreement with France, this is a pilot. This is something we’re trialling.
You can see that we’re pushing the boundaries of the law, but we are straining at the bit to do it. If we have to change the law, we will change the law, as you’ve seen with this government as well.
Here is the agenda for the day.
Morning: Peter Kyle, the business secretary, and Liz Kendall, the science secretary, attend an event in London to discuss the “tech prosperity deal” with the US.
Morning: David Lammy, the justice secretary and deputy PM, visits a prison in London.
10am: Peer start the second day of the second reading debate on the assisted dying bill.
2pm: Hilary Benn, the Northern Ireland secretary, and Simon Harris, the Irish deputy PM, unveil plans for unveil a new framework to deal with the legacy of the NI Troubles in Belfast.
If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm BST at the moment), or message me on social media. I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.
If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary.
I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.
Share
Updated at 10.45 BST
Key events
Show key events only
Please turn on JavaScript to use this feature
UK poised to recognise Palestinian statehood, as poll suggest Britons in favour by 44% to 18%
The UK is preparing to recognise the state of Palestine imminently, after Israel failed to meet conditions that would have postponed the historic step, including a ceasefire in Gaza, Patrick Wintour reports.
YouGov has relased polling today suggesting that Britons are in favour of this by more than two to one, although a large minority of people do not have a view.
Polling on Palestinian state recognition Photograph: YouGovShare
Health unions tell Streeting they won’t take part in pay review body process for 2026/27
Health unions have announced they will not take part in the next pay review body process for 2026/27, PA Media reports. PA says:
The unions are calling on the government to press on with promised direct talks instead to deliver pay awards on time.
The 14 unions representing staff on “agenda for change” contracts within the NHS have written to health secretary Wes Streeting urging him to honour a commitment made last year to tackle the problems in the pay system they say are harming staffing and morale.
Unions say these talks should now be widened to include the headline pay award for 2026, which would need to be decided early next year if it is to be paid on time in April, as ministers have committed to do.
Unions say staff trust and confidence in the current pay process, involving a “time-consuming” pay review body (PRB), has hit rock bottom and a more efficient approach is needed for the coming year.
That means setting aside the PRB process and focusing on talks backed by sufficient investment from ministers to allow a deal to be reached, the unions say.
Share
US and UK to resume talks on possible reductions in tariffs on Scotch whisky
Severin Carrell
Severin Carrell is the Guardian’s Scotland editor.
The US and UK governments are to resume talks on removing or reducing Donald Trump’s 10% tariff on Scottish whisky next week, after the two sides failed to reach agreement during the US president’s state visit.
A source said the industry has been reassured progress had been made in the discussions, with officials due to focus specifically on the issue, after months of intense lobbying and diplomacy aimed at carving out a specific deal on the £970m trade.
Despite the looming battle between Labour and the Scottish National party over who will win next year’s Holyrood elections, the UK and Scottish governments have been closely coordinating their efforts.
John Swinney, the Scottish first minister and SNP leader, was amongst the guests at the state banquet for Trump at Windsor castle – an appearance which was attacked by critics from within the SNP, and one of Nicola Sturgeon’s former aides.
The SNP MP Chris Law posted and then deleted a post on X claiming that the first minister’s attendance was effectively “conceding that it’s acceptable to support” an Israeli genocide in Gaza – a charge Israel denies, and which Swinney rebuffed.
Swinney confirmed during first minister’s questions on Thursday he had again lobbied Trump at Windsor castle, building on a 50-minute meeting he had with the president at the White House earlier this month, along with then British ambassador Peter Mandelson, where the closely-linked US and UK liquor trade was uppermost.
Swinney told MSPs:
I was making representations on behalf of the industry – I was not negotiating a trade deal; that is the proper responsibility of the United Kingdom government.
[I] will continue to engage in order to ensure that I deliver the type of zero-for-zero arrangement that the United States whiskey industry and the Scotch whisky industry are seeking, because I think that that makes economic sense on both sides of the Atlantic.
“Zero for zero” refers to the fact the UK does not have any tariffs on imports of US whiskey and bourbon and also allows tariff-free entry to the $200m worth of whiskey barrels imported each year from Republican states such as Kentucky and Louisiana to mature Scottish whisky.
Scottish producers have already laid off staff, and halted distilling, because of the impact the 10% tariffs have had on US exports, which has a knock-on effect with US barrel sales and production.
Share
Trump remains non-committal on UK getting steel trade concessions, saying US ‘making lot of money’ from tariffs
With Donald Trump now out of the country, there is a debate in the UK about whether all the sucking up and red carpet treatment was actually worth it. Keir Starmer seems to think so. But there were two things that happened after he left UK soil that implied the UK charm offensive might have had less impact that people hoped.
At his press conference at Chequers yesterday Trump did not accept the idea that the US comedian Jimmy Kimmel was having his show cancelled just because he had said something that offended the White House. It was “bad ratings” that explained his sacking, Trump claimed. But, speaking to reporters on Air Force One on his way home, Trump abandoned all qualms about sounding like a dictator and openly declared that networks that cover him negatively should be punished for it.
And, as Trump was flying home, Fox News broadcast an interview with him that was recorded when it was at Chequers. The interviewer, Martha Maccallum, put it to Trump that the trade deal with the UK was “still not finalised”. She was referrring to the fact that the UK is still pushing for concessions on steel and aluminium tariffs.
But Trump pushed back. He said the deal was “a done deal”, although he acccepted that the UK would like to make “adjustments”.
Asked if he was open to that, he replied:
I like ‘em. But we’re making a lot of money [from tariffs].
Trump then implied that he wanted to help. The UK was having “a lot of difficulty”, he said. But he remained non-committal.
Presumably this came as no surprise to Sarah Smith, the BBC’s north America editor. At Chequers, she says she asked Susie Wiles, Trump’s chief of staff, if the state visit would have any impact on the UK’s ability to influence US policy on matters like trade. Wiles replied: “None at all. President Trump will always do what is right for America.”
Share
Reform UK receives £100,000 donation from design firm that faced winding-up petition
Nigel Farage’s Reform UK has received a £100,000 donation from a design and architecture firm that faced a winding-up petition from the tax authorities earlier this year, Rowena Mason reports.
Share
Peers resume second reading debate on assisted dying bill
Peers have just their debate on the second reading of the assisted dying bill. There are 75 of them down to speak (the speaking list is here), and there is a live feed here.
The bill has passed the Commons and, while peers take the view that they are entitled to amend Commons legislation, they generally operate on the basis that it is not their job to block passed by elected MPs.
But this is a private member’s bill, not a government bill enacting a manifesto commitment, and some peers think they they have a lot of latitude in terms of how far they can “amend” the legislation that emerged from the Commons.
The Hansard Society has produced an excellent briefing on the current state of play, and what we can expect from the debate today.
I won’t be covering the debate in detail, but I will cover any highlights, and the result of any votes, which should come at about 4pm.
Share
Share your views on the Corbyn/Sultana ‘Your Party’ split
As Aletha Adu reports, a split has opened between Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana in the formation of their new leftwing party, with the former Labour leader confirming a referral to the Information Commissioner’s Office over an unauthorised membership portal promoted by his co-leader.
Here is Peter Walker’s analysis.
And here is an extract.
It is something of a political cliche that leftwing politicians are prone to splits, and not entirely without truth, even if this does ignore the Conservatives’ recent fondness for toppling leaders and forming themselves into increasingly atomised “tribes”.
But the seemingly irreconcilable split demonstrates that, much like a political right in which Conservatives MPs are defecting to Reform and some Reform MPs are quitting to go solo, the British left is less a coherent force than a semi-allied collection of micro-groups, often with competing interests.
On top of what might be called traditional Corbynism, with its left-tilted economics and populist tendencies, we now have the more explicitly Gaza-focused independents, an increasing threat to Labour fuelled by public disquiet about Israel’s actions.
We would like to hear from Guardian readers about what they think about all this.
Share
British and Irish governments to present new Troubles legacy proposals
The British and Irish governments are to announce a new framework to deal with the legacy of Northern Ireland’s Troubles, in an effort to resolve an issue that has bedevilled politics in the region and relations between London and Dublin, Rory Carroll and Lisa O’Carroll report.
Share
Kyle brushes off Trump’s advice to use military to control UK borders
In an interview with BBC Breakfast, Peter Kyle, the business secretary, was also asked if the government agreed with Donald Trump about involving the military to tackle illegal migration.
Kyle said there was already an option for military involvement (which is true – although not in the way Trump was suggesting). Kyle said:
Well, what he suggested was the military are used, but we have the UK Border Force that is now established and has been reinforced and bolstered and have new powers under this government.
The Navy actually does have a working relationship with the UK Border Force, and the Navy can be called upon if needed.
So we do have the functional relationship that we need between our military and keeping our borders safe and secure but what we really need at the moment is our military focused on all of those really key issues around the world, directly relating to our national defence.
UPDATE: Here is Kiran Stacey’s story on Kyle’s comments.
Share
Updated at 10.15 BST
Business secretary Peter Kyle dismisses Trump’s claim illegal migration ‘destroys countries from within’
Good morning. Donald Trump has gone, but his voice and his impact haven’t. Although Keir Starmer got through their joint press conference without mishap, the president’s comments at Chequers about illegal migration are being reported this morning very prominently – in part because they resonate with the big chunk of political opinion in the UK inclined to agree.
Telegraph splash Photograph: Daily TelegraphSun splash Photograph: SunMail splash Photograph: Daily MailExpress splash Photograph: Daily ExpressTimes splash Photograph: The TimesGuardian splash Photograph: The Guardian
For Trump, who he seems to judge success almost entirely by how much media attention he can command, this is a triumph.
Peter Kyle, the business secretary, was on the media round for the government this morning and inevitably he was asked about this. No 10 has a minor sliver of good news on small boats this morning – a second person has been returned to France under the “one in, one out” deal.
But interviewers wanted to know what Kyle thought about Trump’s comments. At Chequers the president claimed illegal migration “destroys countries”. Trump said:
I think your situation is very similar. You have people coming in and I told the prime minister I would stop it, and it doesn’t matter if you call out the military, it doesn’t matter what means you use
It destroys countries from within and we’re actually now removing a lot of the people that came into our country.
Asked on ITV’s Good Morning Britain if he agreed with Trump about this, Kyle replied:
No. What I do believe is that illegal migration is something that is impacting our politics here in the UK. It is something that the British public expect this government to get a grip on.
That is why today, when we have the second flight taking off with a migrant who doesn’t have the right to stay here being returned as part of the new returns agreement with France, this is a pilot. This is something we’re trialling.
You can see that we’re pushing the boundaries of the law, but we are straining at the bit to do it. If we have to change the law, we will change the law, as you’ve seen with this government as well.
Here is the agenda for the day.
Morning: Peter Kyle, the business secretary, and Liz Kendall, the science secretary, attend an event in London to discuss the “tech prosperity deal” with the US.
Morning: David Lammy, the justice secretary and deputy PM, visits a prison in London.
10am: Peer start the second day of the second reading debate on the assisted dying bill.
2pm: Hilary Benn, the Northern Ireland secretary, and Simon Harris, the Irish deputy PM, unveil plans for unveil a new framework to deal with the legacy of the NI Troubles in Belfast.
If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm BST at the moment), or message me on social media. I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.
If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary.
I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.
Share
Updated at 10.45 BST