Close Menu
Voxa News

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    ‘Don’t Let the Sun’ Director Interview Alienation, Climate Change

    August 8, 2025

    Engineered Garments Spring 2026 Menswear Collection

    August 8, 2025

    Alarm in China that efforts to control Chikungunya virus are infringing on rights | China

    August 8, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Voxa News
    Trending
    • ‘Don’t Let the Sun’ Director Interview Alienation, Climate Change
    • Engineered Garments Spring 2026 Menswear Collection
    • Alarm in China that efforts to control Chikungunya virus are infringing on rights | China
    • How Lakers build around Luka – Fits, options, LeBron’s future
    • This Coastal Town Was Just Named the Wealthiest Suburb in Florida
    • Donald Trump Orders Crackdown on Politically-Motivated ‘Debanking’
    • MPM Premium Boards Mohamed Al-Daradji’s ‘Irkalla: Gilgamesh’s Dream’
    • Gloucestershire support network helped us to breastfeed, say mums
    Friday, August 8
    • Home
    • Business
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Politics
    • Science
    • Sports
    • Travel
    • World
    • Entertainment
    • Technology
    Voxa News
    Home»World»House voting on rule to pave the way to final debate on Trump’s tax-and-spending bill – US politics live | Trump administration
    World

    House voting on rule to pave the way to final debate on Trump’s tax-and-spending bill – US politics live | Trump administration

    By Olivia CarterJuly 3, 2025No Comments17 Mins Read0 Views
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Tumblr Email
    House voting on rule to pave the way to final debate on Trump’s tax-and-spending bill – US politics live | Trump administration
    House convenes to debate Trump's tax and spending bill – watch live
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    ‘We can’t make everyone 100% happy,’ says Johnson as it remains unclear if he has the numbers to pass bill

    Speaker Mike Johnson has said “very positive” progress has been made toward passing Donald Trump’s megabill, but acknowledged that “we can’t make everyone 100% happy” with the final package, CNN reports.

    CNN quotes Johnson as telling reporters:

    When you have a piece of legislation that is this comprehensive and with so many agenda items involved, you’re going to have lots of different priorities and preferences among people because they represent different districts and they have different interests.

    But we can’t make everyone 100% happy. It’s impossible. This is a deliberative body. It’s a legislative process. By definition, all of us have to give up on our personal preferences. [I’m] never going to ask anybody to compromise core principles, but preferences must be yielded for the greater good, and that’s what I think people are recognizing and come to grips with.

    It remains unclear if he has the numbers needed to pass the bill as the House prepares to take a key procedural vote to get the bill closer to final passage.

    Johnson said he – and Trump – have been speaking to conservative hardliners and swing-district Republicans all day about their concerns, adding that “there’s more conversations to be held”.

    We’ve had lots of great conversations. I’ve met with individuals and groups all day long, as has the president – who’s fully engaged as well – trying to convince everybody this is the very best product that we can produce. There’s more conversations to be held.

    Mike Johnson speaks to reporters as he heads to the chamber. Photograph: J Scott Applewhite/APShare

    Key events

    Show key events only

    Please turn on JavaScript to use this feature

    House voting on rule to pave the way to final debate on Trump’s tax-and-spending bill

    After a day-long delay, the House has started a procedural vote on a rule that would open final debate on the tax-and-spending bill Donald Trump wants to sign into law, but the measure has already been voted against by enough Republicans to have it fail.

    The vote is still open, but four Republicans have voted against the rule so far, which means that the measure will fail if all Democrats vote against it as well and no one changes their vote.

    Share

    Updated at 03.03 BST

    Trump attacks Raskin shortly after Democrat told MSNBC Trump ‘might not even understand what’s in the bill’

    Donald Trump is apparently whiling away the hours as the House Republican leadership tries to convince its members to vote for the tax and spending bill he wants to sign by watching television.

    That seems likely because he just posted a blistering attack on Democratic congressman Jamie Raskin, calling him “a third rate Democrat politician, has no idea what is in our fantastic Tax Cut Bill, nor would he understand it if he did. This DOPE has been consistently losing to me for YEARS”.

    As he has so often during Trump’s years in the White House, the president appears to be effectively using social media to type out what he is shouting at the TV. In this case, what seems to have triggered his rage is Raskin’s appearance on MSNBC in the last hour.

    When the host Chris Hayes asked Raskin to comment on a report from the outlet NOTUS that Trump told House Republicans on Wednesday not to “touch” Medicaid, despite the fact that the bill includes over $900bn in Medicaid cuts, Raskin said: “There’s a lot of discussion on the floor about whether or not Trump really understands what’s in this bill or not, and whether he’s out of it.”

    “The extraordinary thing about that is of course all of these people have gotten in line despite their own misgivings because Trump is leading the way, but Trump might not even understand what’s in the bill. So it’s a very dangerous moment when you think about what democracy is, and it doesn’t speak well for what has become of the Republican party”, Raskin added.

    Congressman Jamie Raskin told MSNBC that “Trump might not even understand what’s in the bill” he is pushing congress to pass.Share

    Representative Chip Roy of Texas, a member of the House Freedom Caucus of hard-line fiscal conservatives, told Lisa Desjardins of PBS Newshour within the last hour that he will not vote on the rule to move his party’s massive tax and spending bill forward on Wednesday night. “He was clear,” Desjardins reports, “he does not think that vote should happen tonight and if it does, he is not voting on it.”

    Earlier on Wednesday, Donald Trump met on with the Freedom Caucus, whose members say the Senate-passed version of the bill adds too much to the federal deficit, to try to win their support.

    Another member of the Freedom Caucus, Ralph Norman of South Carolina, told Laura Weiss of Punchbowl News that the caucus told Republican leaders that they will not vote for the rule on the bill tonight and are prefer to return on Thursday morning.

    Trump also met with more moderate Republican House members, who have a nearly opposite objection: that cuts to health and nutrition assistance are too steep.

    Share

    Despite White House access, Dr Phil’s pro-Trump cable network files for bankruptcy

    Merit Street Media, the new conservative cable TV network founded by Phil McGraw, aka Dr Phil, filed for bankruptcy on Wednesday, and sued its partner Trinity Broadcasting, one of the nation’s largest Christian broadcasters.

    McGraw’s openly partisan coverage of the Trump administration has included friendly, soft-focus features on the White House border czar, Tom Homan, and “behind the scenes” reports on Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) raids in Chicago and Los Angeles this year.

    That coverage, as the Hollywood reporter observed, effectively made Dr Phil “an unofficial spokesperson for President Trump in advocating for the raids”.

    McGraw was clearly stung by the criticism of his pro-Trump coverage, and devoted a recent segment of his show to defending it.

    Phil McGraw, aka Dr Phil, defended his soft-focus coverage of Ice raids in a recent segment on his now bankrupt cable TV network.Share

    Updated at 02.18 BST

    Reuters reports that House speaker Mike Johnson still hopes to convince the holdouts in his party to back Trump’s signature tax-and-spending bill, telling reporters: “We’re planning on a vote today.”

    With a narrow 220-212 majority, Johnson can afford no more than three defections from his ranks, and skeptics from the party’s right flank said they had more than enough votes to block the bill.

    “He knows I’m a no. He knows that I don’t believe there are the votes to pass this rule the way it is,” Republican representative Andy Harris of Maryland, leader of the hardline Freedom caucus, told reporters.

    Representative Lisa McClain, who chairs the House Republican Conference, told the news agency that she expects her colleagues to work through procedural votes and bring the bill to a vote before the full House on Wednesday night. “I think we’ll put it on the floor tonight. It may be 10 or 11 o’clock,” McClain said.

    Share

    Updated at 01.42 BST

    House Republicans echo Trump’s false claim that ‘we’re not cutting Medicaid’ as they push for more than $900bn in Medicaid cuts

    When the Republican representative Gabe Evans of Colorado was confronted in the Capitol rotunda on Wednesday by Greg Casar, a progressive Democrat from Texas, about his support for a bill that cuts more than $900bn spending in Medicaid, Evans had a simple reply: “We’re not cutting Medicaid.”

    In fact, according to an analysis this week by the non-partisan Penn Wharton Budget Model, the Republican tax-and-spending bill would cut Medicaid spending by more than $900bn “by imposing work requirements, restricting state-level taxes on healthcare providers that draw federal matching funds, increasing the frequency of eligibility checks, changing Medicaid eligibility requirements based on immigration status, and phasing down state-directed payments to providers under managed care organizations to be in line with Medicare rates”.

    But the Republican party line, dictated by Donald Trump, is simply to deny that reality and claim that the changes to Medicaid are simply about cutting “waste, fraud and abuse”.

    Donald Trump denied on Tuesday that his administration is planning to make sweeping cuts to Medicaid, despite supporting a bill that cuts more than $900bn in Medicaid spending.

    Trump’s repeated denials that the big tax-and-spending bill he wants to sign includes sweeping cuts to Medicaid has apparently confused even some members of his own party.

    The news site NOTUS reported on Wednesday that Trump “doesn’t seem to have a firm grasp” on what is in the bill, because he told moderate Republican House members he met with in urgning them to support the legislation that the party should not touch Medicaid.

    “But we’re touching Medicaid in this bill,” one member responded to Trump, three sources told the outlet.

    Share

    Updated at 01.41 BST

    The day so far

    We are following developments in the US House on Wednesday, where the razor-thin Republican majority is trying to set up a vote on the version of Donald Trump’s tax-and-spending bill passed by the Senate.

    For hours now, the House has been stalled on a procedural vote, which they needed to hold because of an error the House rules committee made when it drafted the rule governing what was then called the one big beautiful bill act (OBBA).

    Right now, the House speaker, Mike Johnson, and the White House are working to put pressure on a handful of Republican holdouts, to ensure that they will vote to approve the bill and get it to Trump to sign by his self-imposed Fourth of July deadline.

    Here are some of the day’s main developments:

    • Speaker Mike Johnson said “very positive” progress had been made toward passing Trump’s megabill, but acknowledged that “we can’t make everyone 100% happy” with the final package.

    • Trump said that the chair of the Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell, “should resign immediately”, after the federal housing regulator called on Congress to investigate him for supposed “political bias”.

    • A federal court ruled that Trump had exceeded his authority in suspending the right to apply for asylum at the southern border by claiming there was an “invasion” across the US-Mexico border.

    • The Democratic representative Josh Riley of New York accused Republicans of hypocrisy during a debate on the House floor about the bill, which includes massive cuts to healthcare spending to fund tax cuts that go mostly to the wealthy. “Don’t tell me you give a shit about the middle class, when all you’re doing is shitting on the middle class,” Riley said.

    • The US and Vietnam struck a trade agreement that sets 20% tariffs on many of the south-east Asian country’s exports following last-minute negotiations, Trump and Vietnamese state media said.

    • The Trump administration asked the supreme court to remove three Democratic members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, who were fired by Trump and then reinstated by a federal judge.

    Share

    Updated at 00.58 BST

    Trump calls on Federal Reserve chair to ‘resign immediately’

    Writing on his social media platform, Truth Social, Donald Trump said on Wednesday that the chair of the Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell, “should resign immediately”. The president of the United States referred to the central banker by the nickname he has assigned to him, and added three exclamation marks to his statement.

    Trump also shared a news report on Bill Pulte, the Federal Housing Finance Agency director, asking Congress to investigate Powell.

    In a letter released on Wednesday, Pulte called on Congress to investigate what he called Powell’s “political bias, and his deceptive Senate testimony, which is enough to be removed ‘for cause’”.

    Pulte also claimed that Powell had lied about upgrades at the central bank’s headquarters.

    Trump has complained repeatedly that Powell has been slow to drop interest rates, and given him the nickname “Too Late”.

    On Tuesday, Powell blamed Trump’s tariffs for preventing the immediate interest rate cuts the president has demanded.

    Share

    Updated at 00.12 BST

    With huge cuts to health insurance coverage in the Republican bill, it is not surprising that Barack Obama, the former president, has spoken out against it and is urging Americans to call their representatives and press them to vote against it.

    “More than 16 million Americans are at risk of losing their health care because Republicans in Congress are rushing to pass a bill that would cut federal funding for Medicaid and weaken the Affordable Care Act,” Obama wrote on social media. “If the House passes this bill, it will increase costs and hurt working class families for generations to come. Call your representative today and tell them to vote no on this bill.”

    Share

    Updated at 23.29 BST

    Representative Derrick Van Orden, a Wisconsin Republican, made some waves earlier in the day when he took issue with a reporter who asked him whether Republicans in Congress were being “led by the nose by President Trump”.

    “The president of the United States didn’t give us an assignment,” Van Orden told Kenzie Nguyen, a student journalist interning for Punchbowl News. “We’re not a bunch of little bitches around here, OK? I’m a member of Congress. I represent almost 800,000 Wisconsinites.”

    Van Orden’s press office did not dispute that the representative, a former Navy Seal, had used that salty language, but scolded the reporter for not adding that he also “stated that President Trump is the leader of the GOP and House Republicans are working in close collaboration with the administration on this bill”.

    Van Orden, his press office said, “looks forward to passing the One, Big, Beautiful Bill and getting it to President Trump’s desk to be signed into law”.

    Share

    Updated at 23.28 BST

    Jake Sherman, the founder of Punchbowl News, which reports exhaustively on Congress, warns that even if House Republicans get the necessary votes to pass the rule, a vote on the final passage might not come until very late at night.

    After the rule is passed, there still needs to be a debate, and the House Democratic leader, Hakeem Jeffries, then gets “a magic minute”, a House custom that allows party leaders to speak for as long as they want to. Jeffries reportedly plans to speak for an hour, well short of the record, set in 2021 by former Republican leader Kevin McCarthy, whose “minute” lasted eight hours and 32 minutes.

    Share

    Updated at 23.24 BST

    As we continue to wait for a handful of Republican holdouts to vote for, or against, the rule that would permit the massive tax-and-spending bill to be taken up by the House, Mike Johnson, the Republican speaker, is urging his members to vote for the bill passed by the Senate.

    “Even though the Senate modified some of our product,” Johnson told reporters, “most of our agenda is wrapped up into this legislation. So it must pass. We have to deliver for the people. The president wants to do it.”

    “I think everyone’s trying to get to yes,” he added. “And I believe we will.”

    Share

    Updated at 23.24 BST

    Representative Victoria Spartz, a Ukrainian-born Indiana Republican, has taken one of the oddest possible positions by saying that she intends to vote for the bill, praising its tax cuts and spending on immigration enforcement, but will vote against the rule, which has to pass for a vote on the bill to actually take place.

    Spartz explained in a radio interview on Tuesday that the version of the bill passed by the Senate exceeds by roughly half a trillion dollars a fiscal framework she and 30 other Republicans in the House support, which set a maximum amount of unfunded commitments. According to Spartz, the speaker, Mike Johnson, broke a promise to not bring any bill up for a vote that added more to the debt than the framework permits.

    Spartz, who has previously compared the national debt to “a ticking time bomb”, said she is not convinced by arguments from the White House that the tax cuts will stimulate economic growth to such an extent that they will pay for themselves.

    The non-partisan Penn Wharton budget model estimated on Tuesday that the Senate-passed reconciliation bill “increases primary deficits by $3.1 trillion over 10 years. The dynamic cost, including changes to the economy, is larger at $3.5 trillion. GDP falls by 0.3 in 10 years and falls by 4.6 in 30 years.”

    Share

    Updated at 23.23 BST

    Chris Stein

    Here’s what Democratic representative Eric Swalwell thinks of the slowdown in voting on the tax-and-spending bill, which has been credited to discontent among rightwing Republican lawmakers.

    “We aren’t delayed because moderates whose constituents will be completely screwed are holding out. We are delayed because the most extreme members who want to hurt MORE people are holding out,” he wrote on X.

    Democrats do not have the numbers to stop the bill from passing the House, and Republican infighting is what is keeping it from advancing.

    Share

    Updated at 23.17 BST

    A CIA review released on Wednesday found flaws in the production of a 2016 US intelligence assessment that Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, “aspired” to help Donald Trump defeat Hillary Clinton in that year’s presidential election, but it did not contest that conclusion.

    The declassified, eight-page review “does not dispute the quality and credibility” of a highly classified CIA report that the assessment’s authors relied on to reach that conclusion, it said.

    But the review questioned the “high confidence” level that the CIA and FBI assigned the conclusion. It should have instead been given the “moderate confidence” rating reached by the National Security Agency, the review said.

    After a November 2017 meeting with Putin in Helsinki, Trump publicly rejected that US intelligence assessment, which had been made public in an unclassified version in January 2017, and said he accepted Putin’s denial that Russia had interfered in the election.

    “President Putin said it’s not Russia,” Trump told reporters in Helsinki. “Let me just say, I don’t see any reason why it would be.”

    At the same news conference in Helsinki, Putin was asked whether he had wanted Trump to win the 2016 election, and if he had directed any of his officials to help him do that. “Yes, I did,” Putin replied to the first part of the question, saying that he had hoped Trump would repair US-Russia ties. He avoided the second part of the question, about whether he directed anyone to help make that happen.

    The CIA director, John Ratcliffe, a former representative who served as the director of national intelligence in Trump’s first term, ordered the review and its “lessons learned” section “to promote analytic objectivity and transparency”, said a CIA press release.

    The CIA’s directorate of analysis, which conducted the review, “identified multiple procedural anomalies” in how the December 2016 classified assessment of Russian election interference was prepared.

    They included “a highly compressed timeline … and excessive involvement of agency heads” and “led to departures from standard practices in the drafting, coordination, and reviewing” of the report, it said.

    “These departures impeded efforts to apply rigorous tradecraft, particularly to the assessment’s most contentious judgment,” it continued.

    The review, however, did not overturn the judgment that Putin employed a disinformation and cyber-campaign to sway the 2016 vote to Trump over his Democratic challenger, Hillary Clinton. A 2018 bipartisan Senate intelligence committee report reached the same conclusion.

    Share

    Updated at 22.19 BST

    Chris Stein

    There’s been some slight movement on the stalled procedural vote that is holding up the House’s consideration of Donald Trump’s tax-and-spending bill.

    To recap, House Republicans managed to prevail earlier this afternoon in a different preliminary vote, but have stalled on a second one, which they only needed to hold because of an error the House rules committee made when it drafted the rule governing what was then called the one big beautiful bill act (OBBA).

    For more than an hour, the vote count was tied at 212 in favor and 212 against. Over the past few minutes, two more yes votes came in, bringing the total to 214 in favor – enough for passage.

    Nonetheless, the vote has not closed, and the House chamber is mostly empty, perhaps a sign that Mike Johnson and other GOP leaders don’t want to move forward to the next step, which is voting on the rule itself, because they have not swayed enough holdout votes.

    Share

    Updated at 22.36 BST

    administration bill debate Final House live pave politics Rule taxandspending Trump Trumps voting
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Olivia Carter
    • Website

    Olivia Carter is a staff writer at Verda Post, covering human interest stories, lifestyle features, and community news. Her storytelling captures the voices and issues that shape everyday life.

    Related Posts

    Donald Trump Orders Crackdown on Politically-Motivated ‘Debanking’

    August 8, 2025

    Israel-Gaza war live: security cabinet approves Gaza City takeover as UK’s Starmer urges Israel to reconsider | Israel

    August 8, 2025

    Why has an AI-altered Bollywood movie sparked uproar in India? | Entertainment

    August 8, 2025

    US offers $50m reward for arrest of Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro

    August 8, 2025

    Trump calls for Intel boss Lip-Bu Tan to resign over alleged China ties

    August 8, 2025

    Protests erupt with Israelis divided over government's plan to "control" Gaza

    August 8, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Medium Rectangle Ad
    Top Posts

    27 NFL draft picks remain unsigned, including 26 second-rounders and Bengals’ Shemar Stewart

    July 17, 20251 Views

    Eight healthy babies born after IVF using DNA from three people | Science

    July 17, 20251 Views

    Massive Attack announce alliance of musicians speaking out over Gaza | Kneecap

    July 17, 20251 Views
    Don't Miss

    ‘Don’t Let the Sun’ Director Interview Alienation, Climate Change

    August 8, 2025

    “The heat keeps rising. People grow distant, in curious kinds of solitude. This is where…

    Engineered Garments Spring 2026 Menswear Collection

    August 8, 2025

    Alarm in China that efforts to control Chikungunya virus are infringing on rights | China

    August 8, 2025

    How Lakers build around Luka – Fits, options, LeBron’s future

    August 8, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews
    Medium Rectangle Ad
    Most Popular

    27 NFL draft picks remain unsigned, including 26 second-rounders and Bengals’ Shemar Stewart

    July 17, 20251 Views

    Eight healthy babies born after IVF using DNA from three people | Science

    July 17, 20251 Views

    Massive Attack announce alliance of musicians speaking out over Gaza | Kneecap

    July 17, 20251 Views
    Our Picks

    As a carer, I’m not special – but sometimes I need to be reminded how important my role is | Natasha Sholl

    June 27, 2025

    Anna Wintour steps back as US Vogue’s editor-in-chief

    June 27, 2025

    Elon Musk reportedly fired a key Tesla executive following another month of flagging sales

    June 27, 2025
    Recent Posts
    • ‘Don’t Let the Sun’ Director Interview Alienation, Climate Change
    • Engineered Garments Spring 2026 Menswear Collection
    • Alarm in China that efforts to control Chikungunya virus are infringing on rights | China
    • How Lakers build around Luka – Fits, options, LeBron’s future
    • This Coastal Town Was Just Named the Wealthiest Suburb in Florida
    • About Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Get In Touch
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    2025 Voxa News. All rights reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.